Wednesday, July 25, 2007

spirits and the Spirit -- alcohol and faith

Many religious people have a propensity for rule-making. Often, this entails a list of do’s and don’t, designed (in theory) to promote spiritual health and ward off negative influences. In some cases these rules are a means of salvation, a way of actually attaining eternal life. In other cases the prescribed regulations determine religious status and/or promote growth.

Before dismissing the rules mentality, it is important to recognize that there are indeed rules in the Bible, intended to benefit humankind. The ten commandments and the golden rule have served humanity quite well for millennia. Not only is there is nothing inherently wrong with rules, but sometimes the rules actually prompt wisdom and healthy living. The key, I think, is to determine what the precise rules are and whether they are applied properly. So it is when it comes to the matter of drinking alcohol.

Certain segments of the church reject the use of alcohol, decrying its consistent abuse and advocating that believers abstain. Others, while not technically advocating abstinence from alcohol, simply frown upon its regular use. Often the impetus for such decision making is not that alcohol is inherently wrong but that it is safer to avoid. Thus, so the thinking goes, if being drunk is wrong, why not abstain from drinking entirely? That way, there is no chance of ever getting drunk. By avoiding alcohol, we show that we are really serious about our walk with God.

The problem with all such rules, however, is that they are simply arbitrary. While the Bible does oppose drunkenness, there is simply no obvious reason for all believers to abstain from alcohol entirely. Jesus drank alcohol and even created it for others (see John 2). Other biblical characters likewise partook of wine and similar beverages. So, what are we to make of the issue of spirituality and alcohol?

First, it is important to recognize the obvious, which is that alcohol is a potentially harmful product. Being a depressant, alcoholic beverages cause us to relax and tend to lessen our inhibitions. Many people have become addicted to alcohol, and many lives have been ruined through its misuse. As Proverbs comments, “Wine is a mocker and strong drink is for fools.” Second, the bible certainly teaches that it is improper to reach a state of intoxication. Though it is difficult to determine where the line is that separates sobriety from drunkenness, it is quite evident that countless individuals cross that line regularly. If we define drunk as being under the control of, our basic guide is this: “Do not be drunk with wine, but be filled with the Holy Spirit.” That is, rather than allowing alcohol to govern our lives, the chief influence should be God. Third, it is evident within Scripture that the proper use of alcohol is both acceptable and potentially good. Though we should, perhaps, consider that in the ancient world the drinking options were severely limited, thus necessitating a greater prevalence of wine–after all, diet coke was not on the menu–it is nonetheless true that alcohol was considered a regular part of the social environment of that day. Jesus and his disciples drank wine. Indeed, the supper that commemorates his death involves the use (not abuse) of wine. What’s more, Jesus did not think it improper to initiate his miraculous ministry by creating wine at a celebration where alcohol had already been flowing freely. This is not to say that he advocated or facilitated drunkenness but that he evidently lacked the rigid scruples of some of his contemporary followers. Fourth, none of this eliminates the principle that we should avoid anything–be it alcohol or something else–that actually endangers us morally or spiritually. While these are matters of wisdom and individual conscience, they are important to keep in mind. Thus, a person who becomes abusive or who is prone to addiction should obviously avoid alcohol entirely. The point here is neither that alcohol is inherently wrong nor that abstinence is necessarily a better choice. What really matters is that we do whatever is good for our spiritual health and that of others. Jesus uses hyperbolic language to make this very point: “If your hand causes you to stumble, cut it off” (Mark 9:43ff).

Some drink because it’s “cool,” while others refrain for the same reason. But the key is not whether or not we drink. The real issue is living for God within the sphere of spiritual liberty. If it hurts you, stay away from it. If it truly hurts someone else, avoid it. Not sure? Pray and seek wisdom. If you can do something responsibly, go for it. 1 Corinthians provides the key: “Whether, then, you eat or drink or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (10:31).

2 comments:

Unknown said...

interestinglt enough the UK has now introduced a smoking ban in all work and social places but is busy encouraging a 24hr drinking culture - we pick our social poisons and our health battles that suit us i guess - or at least more people drink then smoke so make one a more popular policy than the other, lol.

if some christian groups want to abstain then fair enough, if they think others should also abstain, then fair enough again. In our cutlture we can choose where we go to church and where we drink. the same freedom they have to advocate an idea is the same freedom we have to not advocate it :)

Dr. Carmen C. DiCello said...

Interesting thoughts . . .

I have no problem with affording people freedom to state their views, whatever they are, whether we agree with these views or not.

I also think we must be humble and open about our views, neglecting neither common sense nor the realization that we are all prone to error.

One thing I am concerned about, however, is when Christians create and urge standards that are not drawn from Scripture. When it comes to drinking, it seems to be completely wrong to set up prohibitions where Scripture does not.

I also think that we should avoid being enslaved to our freedom, that is, unable to give up freedom for the sake of love and holiness.

Regarding social "poisons," I'm both fascinated and somewhat puzzled by the things that we do.
Part of me sympathizes with those who want to oppose such dangerous practices. Another part of me doesn't really care that much about such things. I do think that there is a strong tendency to do what everyone else is doing and to allow political correctness to determine our scruples.

I agree with you that we have the freedom to disagree. Sometimes (not always), though, this can degenerate into a kind of relativism in which there is no, shall we say, measuring stick for deciding whose closest to the truth and who is in error. This is the debate that has been fostered in a pluralistic world.

Okay, I'm rambling. :-)

Thanks for the thoughts.

Carmen